Radiocarbon dating decay
Neutrons that come from these fragmented atoms collide with C to be useful in age estimates.This is a critical assumption in the dating process.
Atomic mass is a combination of the number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus.The procedures used are not necessarily in question. The secular (evolutionary) worldview interprets the universe and world to be billions of years old. The use of carbon-14 dating is often misunderstood.Carbon-14 is mostly used to date once-living things (organic material). Carbon-14 is constantly being added to the atmosphere.It cannot be used directly to date rocks; however, it can potentially be used to put time constraints on some inorganic material such as diamonds (diamonds could contain carbon-14). Cosmic rays from outer space, which contain high levels of energy, bombard the earth’s upper atmosphere.These cosmic rays collide with atoms in the atmosphere and can cause them to come apart.The earth has a magnetic field around it which helps protect us from harmful radiation from outer space. The stronger the field is around the earth, the fewer the number of cosmic rays that are able to reach the atmosphere.
This would result in a smaller production of The cause for the long term variation of the C-14 level is not known.
(The electrons are so much lighter that they do not contribute significantly to the mass of an atom.)C), also referred to as radiocarbon, is claimed to be a reliable dating method for determining the age of fossils up to 50,000 to 60,000 years.
If this claim is true, the biblical account of a young earth (about 6,000 years) is in question, since C dates of tens of thousands of years are common.1 When a scientist’s interpretation of data does not match the clear meaning of the text in the Bible, we should never reinterpret the Bible.
If this assumption is not true, then the method will give incorrect dates. If the production rate of C in a specimen difficult or impossible to accurately determine. Willard Libby, the founder of the carbon-14 dating method, assumed this ratio to be constant.
His reasoning was based on a belief in evolution, which assumes the earth must be billions of years old.
So, a carbon atom might have six neutrons, or seven, or possibly eight—but it would always have six protons.